Volume 11, Issue 42 (3-2023)
Haft Hesar J Environ Stud 2023, 11(42): 127-143 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Alaljenabian A, Andalib A, Saeideh Zarabadi Z. Explaining the dialectic and balanced model of
the conservation-development dichotomy of historic urban areas. Haft Hesar J Environ Stud 2023; 11 (42) :127-143
URL: http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-1840-en.html
URL: http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-1840-en.html
Abstract: (439 Views)
Introduction: Conflict in the conservation-development dichotomy is among the main challenges in the
face of historic urban areas, which destroys heritage values, as well as hinders the actualization of
development objectives, and deteriorates the historic urban areas. The present study aims to explain the
dialectic and balanced model of conservation- development of historic urban areas, redefining the
concepts of conservation and development in the face of historic urban areas, evaluating the roots of
forming intellectual conflicts, and providing a rational framework and method for understanding and
eliminating the conflict of conservation-development dichotomy.
Method: This Research is fundamental, by qualitative content analysis and logical reasoning strategy, at
the ontological level through the analysis of philosophical texts, understands the basic meaning of
"relationship", conservation and development, and at the epistemological level through analytical
reading of theories, effective components In the recognition of conservation-development dichotomy is
explained. The final product of the research is the explanation of the dialectical and balanced model of
conservation-development of historical urban areas.
Results: At the theoretical level, the results include redefining the relationship between conservation
and development, showing that their relationship interacts with conflict in a dialectic process, while the
scope and depth of each expanded, leading to their evolution and promotion. At the philosophical level,
the results show that all the concepts are considered contradictory and unbalanced in both internal and
external areas (intermediate concerning other concepts), leading to a move to return to balance and
interact with other concepts and achieve a higher position in the hierarchy of actualization in the
concept.
Conclusion: Based on the results, conservation and development are inherently integrated and balanced.
In addition, passing through the dialectic stages in different dimensions of the conservation-development
dichotomy leads to the elimination of internal conflicts, the creation of a balance between the concepts,
and their promotion
face of historic urban areas, which destroys heritage values, as well as hinders the actualization of
development objectives, and deteriorates the historic urban areas. The present study aims to explain the
dialectic and balanced model of conservation- development of historic urban areas, redefining the
concepts of conservation and development in the face of historic urban areas, evaluating the roots of
forming intellectual conflicts, and providing a rational framework and method for understanding and
eliminating the conflict of conservation-development dichotomy.
Method: This Research is fundamental, by qualitative content analysis and logical reasoning strategy, at
the ontological level through the analysis of philosophical texts, understands the basic meaning of
"relationship", conservation and development, and at the epistemological level through analytical
reading of theories, effective components In the recognition of conservation-development dichotomy is
explained. The final product of the research is the explanation of the dialectical and balanced model of
conservation-development of historical urban areas.
Results: At the theoretical level, the results include redefining the relationship between conservation
and development, showing that their relationship interacts with conflict in a dialectic process, while the
scope and depth of each expanded, leading to their evolution and promotion. At the philosophical level,
the results show that all the concepts are considered contradictory and unbalanced in both internal and
external areas (intermediate concerning other concepts), leading to a move to return to balance and
interact with other concepts and achieve a higher position in the hierarchy of actualization in the
concept.
Conclusion: Based on the results, conservation and development are inherently integrated and balanced.
In addition, passing through the dialectic stages in different dimensions of the conservation-development
dichotomy leads to the elimination of internal conflicts, the creation of a balance between the concepts,
and their promotion
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2023/04/24 | Accepted: 2023/03/1 | Published: 2023/03/1
Received: 2023/04/24 | Accepted: 2023/03/1 | Published: 2023/03/1
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
