----------------------------- ----------------------------
Volume 5, Issue 18 (2-2017)                   Haft Hesar J Environ Stud 2017, 5(18): 117-137 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Comparative Study of the Perception of Complexity in Modern and Traditional Buildings (Case Study: Ardakan). Haft Hesar J Environ Stud. 2017; 5 (18) :117-137
URL: http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-273-en.html
Abstract:   (2511 Views)

This study is based on the comparison of the perceived complexity between modern and traditional common house in Ardakan city; The main question of this research is that: The interest and communication of people is more common today, In which one of the two categories of traditional and modern houses. In order to answer the research's question, Terms of traditional buildings and modern Ardakan city, We selected two typical homes - traditional and modern buildings of ardakan in yazd and placed them in six different levels and then these houses were analyzed in terms of complexity, high, middle and low. This research method "descriptive analysis" is done; The combination of field data collection methods and techniques of library and Using a questionnaire of Forty-four third year undergraduate student of architecture and other disciplines, such that the gender distribution was observed in both groups simultaneously, has been questioned. The buildings are designed with questions, images that the students were given a questionnaire. In the hypotheses of this research considered that the view of today's popular buildings of Ardakan are more complexity than traditional homes of the city. The analysis made in this regard as a result it was found that the basic premise of the study with significantly different than 9/90 of the 1/9 percent is not correct; It also became clear that the perceived complexity of the architecture students of 01/0 percent of architecture students

Full-Text [PDF 293 kb]   (689 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/03/12 | Accepted: 2017/03/12 | Published: 2017/03/12

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Haft Hesar Journal of Environmental Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb