Volume 14, Issue 51 (7-2025)
Haft Hesar J Environ Stud 2025, 14(51): 125-140 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khodadadi Agh ghaleh F, Bandarabad A, Shahgheraghi A. Spatial Configuration of Contemporary Housing: A Systematic Review of Concepts and Thematic Contexts. Haft Hesar J Environ Stud 2025; 14 (51) :125-140
URL: http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-2225-en.html
URL: http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-2225-en.html
Spatial Configuration of Contemporary Housing: A Systematic Review of Concepts and Thematic Contexts
Abstract: (7 Views)
Introduction: Considering the importance of housing as a reflection of residents’ cultural and social values, and the growing expansion of scientific studies in the field of architectural psychology—especially in relation to housing—there is a pressing need to examine the trajectory of scholarly thought and research in this domain. A particular gap is observed in the intersection between spatial configuration and gendered perception of space. This study aims to conduct a systematic review of domestic research articles published between 2001 to 2024 that focus on the spatial configuration of housing. The goal is to analyze how this concept has been defined, what influencing factors have been identified, and to offer recommendations to improve the quality and generalizability of future studies in scholarly publications.
Methodology: The research adopts a qualitative approach using the systematic review method. In the initial search process, 55,064 studies were identified through structured filtering techniques, among which 2,747 belonged to the domain of arts and architecture. After detailed screening, 289 relevant articles were selected. Using the PRISMA statement as a methodological framework, the analysis focused on documents explicitly addressing housing configuration, encompassing both physical and psycho-perceptual dimensions.
Results: Findings revealed that the concept of "spatial configuration of housing" with an emphasis on gendered perception remains underexplored in existing literature. Most studies have focused on quantitative aspects, often disregarding gender differences in spatial experience. Of the 14 key thematic categories identified, the majority of research centered on “spatial structure” and “lived experience/place attachment,” and predominantly employed qualitative (descriptive-analytical) methods. Moreover, while acknowledging the psychological nature of spatial configuration and its behavioral consequences, few studies have delved into its emotional, cognitive, or perceptual mechanisms. Researchers have primarily examined the human and spatial aspects of this connection, leaving theoretical and analytical gaps in understanding gendered perception and spatial meaning.
Conclusion: The current body of literature shows a concentration on certain dominant themes while overlooking the nuanced psychological and gendered dimensions of housing spatial configuration. The lack of theoretical frameworks related to gender perception and place has hindered the development of cohesive and generalizable findings. This review underscores the necessity for interdisciplinary and theory-driven approaches to enhance the depth and applicability of future research in this field.
Methodology: The research adopts a qualitative approach using the systematic review method. In the initial search process, 55,064 studies were identified through structured filtering techniques, among which 2,747 belonged to the domain of arts and architecture. After detailed screening, 289 relevant articles were selected. Using the PRISMA statement as a methodological framework, the analysis focused on documents explicitly addressing housing configuration, encompassing both physical and psycho-perceptual dimensions.
Results: Findings revealed that the concept of "spatial configuration of housing" with an emphasis on gendered perception remains underexplored in existing literature. Most studies have focused on quantitative aspects, often disregarding gender differences in spatial experience. Of the 14 key thematic categories identified, the majority of research centered on “spatial structure” and “lived experience/place attachment,” and predominantly employed qualitative (descriptive-analytical) methods. Moreover, while acknowledging the psychological nature of spatial configuration and its behavioral consequences, few studies have delved into its emotional, cognitive, or perceptual mechanisms. Researchers have primarily examined the human and spatial aspects of this connection, leaving theoretical and analytical gaps in understanding gendered perception and spatial meaning.
Conclusion: The current body of literature shows a concentration on certain dominant themes while overlooking the nuanced psychological and gendered dimensions of housing spatial configuration. The lack of theoretical frameworks related to gender perception and place has hindered the development of cohesive and generalizable findings. This review underscores the necessity for interdisciplinary and theory-driven approaches to enhance the depth and applicability of future research in this field.
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2023/08/19 | Accepted: 2024/04/7 | Published: 2025/07/1
Received: 2023/08/19 | Accepted: 2024/04/7 | Published: 2025/07/1
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
