Volume 14, Issue 51 (7-2025)
Haft Hesar J Environ Stud 2025, 14(51): 125-140 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khodadadi Agh ghaleh F, Bandarabad A, Shahgheraghi A. Spatial Configuration of Contemporary Housing: A Systematic Review of Concepts and Thematic Contexts. Haft Hesar J Environ Stud 2025; 14 (51) :125-140
URL: http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-2225-en.html
URL: http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-2225-en.html
Spatial Configuration of Contemporary Housing: A Systematic Review of Concepts and Thematic Contexts
1- Department of Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch
2- Department of Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch
3- Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch
2- Department of Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch
3- Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch
Abstract: (615 Views)
Introduction: Considering the importance of housing as a reflection of residents’ cultural and social values, and the growing expansion of scientific studies in the field of architectural psychology—especially in relation to housing—there is a pressing need to examine the trajectory of scholarly thought and research in this domain. A particular gap is observed in the intersection between spatial configuration and gendered perception of space. This study aims to conduct a systematic review of domestic research articles published between 2001 to 2024 that focus on the spatial configuration of housing. The goal is to analyze how this concept has been defined, what influencing factors have been identified, and to offer recommendations to improve the quality and generalizability of future studies in scholarly publications.
Methodology: The research adopts a qualitative approach using the systematic review method. In the initial search process, 55,064 studies were identified through structured filtering techniques, among which 2,747 belonged to the domain of arts and architecture. After detailed screening, 289 relevant articles were selected. Using the PRISMA statement as a methodological framework, the analysis focused on documents explicitly addressing housing configuration, encompassing both physical and psycho-perceptual dimensions.
Results: Findings revealed that the concept of "spatial configuration of housing" with an emphasis on gendered perception remains underexplored in existing literature. Most studies have focused on quantitative aspects, often disregarding gender differences in spatial experience. Of the 14 key thematic categories identified, the majority of research centered on “spatial structure” and “lived experience/place attachment,” and predominantly employed qualitative (descriptive-analytical) methods. Moreover, while acknowledging the psychological nature of spatial configuration and its behavioral consequences, few studies have delved into its emotional, cognitive, or perceptual mechanisms. Researchers have primarily examined the human and spatial aspects of this connection, leaving theoretical and analytical gaps in understanding gendered perception and spatial meaning.
Conclusion: The current body of literature shows a concentration on certain dominant themes while overlooking the nuanced psychological and gendered dimensions of housing spatial configuration. The lack of theoretical frameworks related to gender perception and place has hindered the development of cohesive and generalizable findings. This review underscores the necessity for interdisciplinary and theory-driven approaches to enhance the depth and applicability of future research in this field.
Methodology: The research adopts a qualitative approach using the systematic review method. In the initial search process, 55,064 studies were identified through structured filtering techniques, among which 2,747 belonged to the domain of arts and architecture. After detailed screening, 289 relevant articles were selected. Using the PRISMA statement as a methodological framework, the analysis focused on documents explicitly addressing housing configuration, encompassing both physical and psycho-perceptual dimensions.
Results: Findings revealed that the concept of "spatial configuration of housing" with an emphasis on gendered perception remains underexplored in existing literature. Most studies have focused on quantitative aspects, often disregarding gender differences in spatial experience. Of the 14 key thematic categories identified, the majority of research centered on “spatial structure” and “lived experience/place attachment,” and predominantly employed qualitative (descriptive-analytical) methods. Moreover, while acknowledging the psychological nature of spatial configuration and its behavioral consequences, few studies have delved into its emotional, cognitive, or perceptual mechanisms. Researchers have primarily examined the human and spatial aspects of this connection, leaving theoretical and analytical gaps in understanding gendered perception and spatial meaning.
Conclusion: The current body of literature shows a concentration on certain dominant themes while overlooking the nuanced psychological and gendered dimensions of housing spatial configuration. The lack of theoretical frameworks related to gender perception and place has hindered the development of cohesive and generalizable findings. This review underscores the necessity for interdisciplinary and theory-driven approaches to enhance the depth and applicability of future research in this field.
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2023/08/19 | Revised: 2025/07/16 | Accepted: 2024/04/7 | Published: 2025/07/1 | ePublished: 2025/07/1
Received: 2023/08/19 | Revised: 2025/07/16 | Accepted: 2024/04/7 | Published: 2025/07/1 | ePublished: 2025/07/1
References
1. دلشاد سیاهکلی، مهسا.، بمانیان، محمدرضا و مهدوی نژاد، محمد جواد. (1397). سنجش کیفیت محیطی سیستم مکان- رفتار تعاملی در اندامهای گذار محیط های یادگیری کودکان (نمونه موردی: مدارس ابتدایی محدوده شمال شرق). معماری و شهرسازی ایران، 9 (16)، 117-110.
2. زارعی، قاسم و محمودی پاچال، زینب. (1398). واکاوی مطالعات گردشگری ایران از نظر موضوعی و روش شناختی و ترسیم آیندۀ مطالعات پژوهشی. گردشگری و توسعه، (8)، 1-19.
3. سامه، رضا و اکرمی، غلامرضا. (1393). تبیین مفهوم معماری به مثابه «امر معماری» از ماهیت تا کیفیت. صفه، 4 (1)، 29 - 3.
4. فتح بقالی، عاطفه و صنیعی پور، حمید. (1397). تأثیر عناصرکالبد -فضایی (معماری) بر دلبستگی به مکان شهروندان در مجموعه بازار تبریز. آمایش محیط، 11 (43)، 97 - 123 .
5. قره بگلو، مینو و رشاد، لاله. (1400). عوامل تصویرپذیر درخانه های دورۀ قاجار در شهر تبریز. تحقیقات جغرافیایی، 3۶ (3)، 241-233.
6. کیانی، مهدخت.، سلطان زاده، حسین و حیدری، علی اکبر. (1398). سنجش انعطاف پذیری نظام فضایی با استفاد ه از تکنیک چیدمان فضا (مطالعۀ مورد ی: خانه های شهر قزوین). باغ نظر،16 (71 )، 76.
7. لنگ،جان (1381). آفرینش نظریه معماری، نقش علوم رفتاری در طراحی محیط؛ ترجمه علیرضا عینی فر، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
8. موسوی، محمد حامد و افضلیان، خسرو. (1398). تحلیل مورفولوژیک معماری مسکونی مدرن در کشورهای ترکیه و ایران. نمونه موردی: کاخ چانکایا و کاخ سعد آباد، معماری و شهرسازی ایران، 10 (17)، 113 - 1.
9. Alhadidi, S., & Mitcheltree, H. (2016). Performative Architectural Practice. Sydney: UTS School of Architecture.
10. Bayhan, H. G., & Karaca, E. (2020). Technological innovation in architecture and engineering education-an investigation on three generations from Turkey. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1-22. [DOI:10.1186/s41239-020-00207-0]
11. Byun, N., & Choi, J. (2016). A typology of Korean housing units: In search of spatial configuration. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 15(1), 41-48. [DOI:10.3130/jaabe.15.41]
12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
13. Chaszar, A., & Joyce, S. C. (2016). Generating freedom:Questions of flexibility in digital design and architectural computation. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 14(2), 167-181. [DOI:10.1177/1478077116638945]
14. Chung, W. J., Liu, C., & Seong, Y.-B. (2019). Potentiallighting and thermal demand reduction in office buildings using blind control considering surrounding buildings.Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering,18(3), 262-270. [DOI:10.1080/13467581.2019.1641409]
15. Dursun, P. (2007, June). Space syntax in architectural design. In 6th international space syntax symposium (pp. 01-56).
16. Dwivedi, Y. K., Venkitachalam, K., Sharif, A. M., Al- Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2011). Research trends in knowledge management: Analyzing the past and predicting the future. Information Systems Management, 28(1), 43-56. [DOI:10.1080/10580530.2011.536112]
17. Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods. London: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Hayward, D. G. (1975). Home as an environmental and psychological concept.
19. Hillier, B. & Vaughan, L. (2007). The city as one thing,Progress in Planning, Progress in Planning, 67(3), 205-230.,(67), 205-230. [DOI:10.1016/j.progress.2007.03.001]
20. Krohn, W., Layton Jr, E. T., & Weingart, P. (2012).The dynamics of science and technology: social values,technical norms and scientific criteria in the development of knowledge.V. 2. Berlin: Springer.
21. Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the royal society of medicine, 96(3), 118-121. [DOI:10.1177/014107680309600304] [PMID] []
22. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., ... & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Bmj, 339. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.b2700] [PMID] []
23. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Bmj, 339. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.b2535] [PMID] []
24. Moher, D, Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic reviews, 10(1), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-1 [DOI:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1] [PMID] []
25. Oswald, F., Schilling, O., Wahl, H. W., Fänge, A., Sixsmith, J., & Iwarsson, S. (2006). Homeward bound: Introducing a four-domain model of perceived housing in very old age. Journal of environmental psychology, 26(3), 187-201. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.07.002]
26. Page, M. J. (2021). E McKenzie J., Bossuyt PM, Boutron I., Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L., Tetzlaff JM, Moher D. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: Development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol, 134, 103-112. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003] [PMID]
27. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons. [DOI:10.1002/9780470754887]
28. Ramprasad, V., & Subbaiyan, G. (2017). Perceived indoor environmental quality of classrooms and outcomes: a study of a higher education institution in India. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 13(3), 202-222. [DOI:10.1080/17452007.2017.1287050]
29. Rapoport,A (2000). Theory,Culture& Housing . Housing , Theory & Society. Volume 17(4):145-165. [DOI:10.1080/140360900300108573]
30. Rapoport,A (2005). Culture Architecture & Design. Locke science publishing company,Inc.
31. Shahbazi, M. Bemanian, M. R. & Lotfi, A. (2018).A Comparative Analysis of Spatial Configuration in Designing Residential Houses Using Space Syntax Method (Case Studies: Houses of Isfahan and Modern Architecture Styles). Applied Arts Studies, 3(1), 21-40.
32. Shahhosseini, H. (2014). Influence of Non-visual Factors on Visual Preferences of Visitors to Small Urban Parks in Tabraz, Iran. Selangor: Universiti Putra Malaysia.•
33. Shahhosseini, H., Kamal, M., & Maulan, S. B. (2014).Determining sound, smell, and touch attributes in small urban parks using NGT. ALAM CIPTA, International Journal of Sustainable Tropical Design Research and Practice, 7(2), 3-16.
34. Sixsmith, J. A., & Sixsmith, A. J. (1987). Empirical phenomenology: principles and method. Quality and Quantity, 21(3), 313-333. [DOI:10.1007/BF00134526]
35. Stretch, D., Sofaer, N. (2012). How to write a systematic review of reasons. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38(2), 121- 126. [DOI:10.1136/medethics-2011-100096] [PMID] []
36. Tversky, B. (1993). Cognitive Maps, Cognitive Collages, and Spatial Mental Models. In: Frank A.U., Campari I.Eds: Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS. COSIT 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science,716. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. [DOI:10.1007/3-540-57207-4_2]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
